Artificial Intelligence and Lawyers

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAWYERS

1. How does Artificial Intelligence help my lawyer?

Artificial Intelligence acts as a supporting tool, accelerating legal research into legislation and case law, analysing large volumes of documents such as contracts and case files, and automating routine tasks. This allows the lawyer to dedicate more time to the substantive strategy of the case and to communication with the client. At the same time, it helps to identify critical elements that could be missed in a manual reading of hundreds of pages. However, it in no way replaces human judgement, experience and the defence of the client’s interests before a court.

2. Is my personal data safe when AI is used?

Confidentiality is a fundamental obligation of the lawyer and is not waived by the use of technological tools. Serious law firms select applications that comply with the principles of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), avoid entering sensitive information into open models and prefer solutions with secure storage. The client is entitled to ask their lawyer exactly how they protect the data of the case. Liability always remains with the lawyer, even when third-party software is used to process information.

3. Can AI replace the lawyer in court?

No. Representation before a court, the assessment of witness testimony, negotiation with opposing parties and the strategy of each case all require human judgement, psychology and a deep knowledge of Greek law. AI tools may produce incorrect or non-existent citations to judgments, a phenomenon known as “hallucinations”. The lawyer reviews, cross-checks and adapts the output, assuming full responsibility for the pleading they sign. Human presence remains irreplaceable, particularly in criminal cases, where the liberty and reputation of the defendant are at stake.

4. Are legal service costs reduced thanks to AI?

In some cases, yes. The automation of repetitive tasks, such as the review of standardised contracts or the search of case law, can reduce preparation time and allow more competitive fees for specific services. However, complex matters, such as criminal trials, administrative appeals or real estate title checks, require specialised human work that cannot be compressed. The client should view AI as a tool for quality and speed, not necessarily as a means of cheaply addressing serious matters that affect their life and property.

5. Who is liable if AI provides incorrect legal information?

Sole liability rests with the lawyer handling the case. AI tools do not provide legally binding advice and often produce erroneous or outdated results, particularly when they concern Greek law, which changes frequently. The lawyer is required to verify every reference to a statute or judgment before filing a pleading. Clients who rely on answers from free AI tools for serious matters risk missing deadlines, losing rights or filing erroneous applications. Personalised advice from an experienced legal professional remains the safe option.

6. How can I ensure that my case will not be handled mechanically?

By choosing a law firm that treats Artificial Intelligence as a supporting tool and not as a substitute for the personal relationship with the client. Ask for a detailed briefing on the strategy, take part in decisions and ensure that the lawyer in charge personally knows the details of your case. Our firm uses modern technological tools for speed and accuracy, while always maintaining personal contact, the systematic study of each file, and the passion for defending the client’s interests as the core of our work.